2 Comments
User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

The shift from "what works" to "why it works" is key here. Frameworks get copied wrong all the time beacuse people lift the surface pattern without the underlying logic. I've watched companies try to clone other org structures and fail miserably since they missed the eocnomic principles that made those structures effective in the first place. The adaptability you mention only comes from understanding first principles.

Cameron Belt's avatar

Couldn't agree more. The number of times that I've worked with teams in the past that seemed to default to "This is what we did at Tesla...Meta...Apple...McKinsey...Bain...etc." showed me that frameworks are better than playbooks. Frameworks allow for thinking and approaching unique problems within specific contexts that come in different companies, products, and markets. I saw that you follow both Vane Ginn and AAS economics, which is awesome. I think you'll find that there's a good amount of underlying Austrian logic to what I've put together. Across both this Growth Isn't One Sided project and my Economics for Busy People series.